Within Hours of Strzok and McCabe Covering up Contents of Weiner Laptop, Strzok’s Wife Was Promoted to SEC Deputy Director (Video)

by N.Morgan

 

None of us will forget the moment when Rep. Louie Gohmert called Peter Strzok out for cheating on his wife, in front of millions of people, thus pointing out Strzok issue with telling the truth.

Some people felt it was a bit disrespectful to Peter Strzok’s wife, Melissa Hodgman. She, like her “husband”, works for the Deep State.

Ladies and Gentlemen…We have our smoking gun, and here’s how:

Now…think back to the purpose of the Strzok hearings:

The purpose of the Strzok hearings was to find out whether or not Strzok’s BIAS influenced his decisions in the Clinton Investigation.

His wife was a fixer for Hillary Clinton and that is exactly what she did.

Remember when the Weiner laptop was discovered, and the FBI found classified emails from Hillary Clinton on it?

Apparently, it is the job of the SEC Deputy Director to decide whether or not a case is to proceed to a full investigation. Within hours of Strzok and McCabe being debriefed on the contents of the Weiner laptop, Strzok’s wife, Melissa Hodgman, was promoted to the position of SEC Deputy Director.

Remember the countless times the Clinton Foundation has been accused of crimes but nothing was sent over to the FBI or Justice Department?

It was Melissa Hodgman covering for the Clinton’s and deciding no charges should be made.

This is true deep state stuff. She even uses her maiden name to keep hidden from the public that she is married to Peter Strzok. Such a simple sleight of hand, so the public wouldn’t know, and remain in the dark about the truth.

Salary Information:
https://www.federalpay.org/employees/securities-and-exchange-commission/hodgman-melissa-r

http://wagpolitics.com/tag/melissa-hodgman-strzok/

Press Release:
https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-217.html

[SOURCE]

References:

https://www.federalpay.org/employees/securities-and-exchange-commission/hodgman-melissa-r

http://wagpolitics.com/tag/melissa-hodgman-strzok/

https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-217.html

https://www.thelibertyeagle.com/strzoks-wife-is-deputy-director-of-sec-covering-for-clinton-foundation/

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Advertisements

It’s Really Really Bad Folks! House Intel Committee Released Classified Memo Without Redaction’s (Videos)

Guest contributor John Rolls

Daily News

Published on Jul 18, 2018

What is Nunes’ FISA memo? 6 things to know about the secret document

The controversial memo detailing alleged federal surveillance abuses was declassified and released Friday following approval by President Trump.

The memo, put together by House Republicans, shows improper surveillance techniques used by the Department of Justice and the FBI in the Russia investigation, GOP lawmakers said.

Democrats have dismissed the memo, arguing that it was selectively edited by Republicans to push a narrative that the Russia investigation is biased against the president. They have their own rebuttal memo they hope to soon release.

Read more here: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/07/what-is-nunes-fisa-memo-6-things-to-know-about-secret-document.html

[SOURCE]

Pole Shift Imminent The Safe Zones, Poles May Flip & Things Could Get Really Bad (Video)

Guest contributor Jeffery Prichett

RED ALERT!! Pole Shift imminent The Safe Zones, Poles May Flip & Things Could Get Really Bad

Earth’s magnetic field is what protects our planet from harmful space radiation. However, our protective shield might soon go into a transformation that could threaten the lives on Earth. This video shows what will happen when Earth’s magnetic poles flip.

Jasonvideos5
Okay, so the poles flip. Since the Earth is vulnerable during this transition period my question is how long will this period last, can we ride it out or does it last hundreds of years before the reversal is complete.

[SOURCE]

Peter Strzok’s Girlfriend Blows the Whistle (Video)

by N. Morgan

 

The Republicans had hoped to have the testimony of Lisa Page already in hand when they started questioning Peter Strzok, but on Wednesday, 11 July 2018, Lisa Page foiled that strategy by refusing to comply with a subpoena and be questioned by the committee in private.

Instead, she presented herself two days later, let the testimony of Peter Strzok set the tone before sharing her version of things.

Speaking with select House committee members, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page was “cooperative” and “credible” during a closed-door session which lasted nearly five hours on Friday, 13 July 2018.

U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, Republican from North Carolina, had been among Page’s harshest critics heading into the session, but he said her cooperation during the session, “speaks well of her,” according to the Hill.

“She’s been willing to help in the spirit of transparency. … We’ve certainly learned additional things today,”Meadows said.

In the private testimony, she primarily answered questions about the text messages with Peter Strzok which allegedly showed bias against then-candidate Donald Trump, the New York Post reported.

Meadows called Page a “credible witness,” as he walked out of the hearing, the report said.

U.S. Rep. John Ratcliffe, Republican from Texas, was more concerned with corroborating Lisa Page’s account with that of Strzok.

A Democratic congressional source told the Hill that two hours into the interview, Lisa Page did not appear to have contradicted Strzok’s testimony in any way.

“Lisa Page is not an FBI employee, but the FBI was here providing counsel and giving her direction as to which questions to answer or not answer and there is a question as to the propriety of that before the House,”

According to the Hill, Matt Gaetz, Republican from Florida, questioned the presence of the FBI providing legal support. “Lisa Page is not an FBI employee, but the FBI was here providing counsel and giving her direction as to which questions to answer or not answer, and there is a question as to the propriety of that before the House.”

Matt Gaetz also said he found the testimony of Lisa Page to be “more credible” than Strzok, the New York Post reported.

Lisa Page turned on Peter Strzok and is Telling Them EVERYTHING!

The investigation into the emails of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and the implications of their actions are just the latest in a string of events, missteps, and cover-ups which have taken place in the federal justice system, all kept hidden from American citizens for so long.

Disclosures in recent years have revealed public officials at the highest levels – White House, U.S. Senate, judiciary – guilty of dishonest and illegal behavior resulting even in death.

During this same period of time, the law itself became a weapon to be used by Government against American citizens. This has resulted in the prosecution, conviction, and imprisonment of individuals for actions which were not even criminal, and the ultimate destruction of all faith by the public in the current justice system.

It will take time for the American public to begin to believe again in the federal justice system because of the rampant corruption which has now been revealed. The slow judiciary actions to remove and prosecute those revealed to be at fault will only delay this return of faith.

[SOURCE]

References:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/14/lisa-page-cooperative-credible-lawmakers-say-after-5-hour-closed-door-session.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJPM5HBBy70&feature=youtu.be

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Billionaire Calling For ‘Nuclear War’ To Stop President Trump and So Are the Rothschilds (Videos)

by N. Morgan

 

The hysteria over the current president is driving his opposition to call for the ultimate end, nuclear war.

Left-wing billionaire Tom Steyer said perhaps there could be a “nuclear war” that would provide a “real course correction” to Donald Trump’s presidency during a recent interview published by Rolling Stone.

He said: 

“I remember 2006,” Steyer said. “What happened is that George W. Bush, he put us in two disastrous wars and we were headed toward the biggest financial disaster since the Great Depression. So if the answer is that we need those three things to happen for a course correction, I’d prefer to move a little quicker. How about that? But I take your point. Maybe we can have, like, a nuclear war and then we get a real course correction.

The shocked interviewer Tim Dickinson responded, that was a “sobering” thought, and Steyer replied he would take back the “nuclear war” comment.

Baroness de Rothschild Obsessed with the Breakout of Nuclear War

BATTLE FOR WORLDThe aristocrat prophetess Baroness De Rothschild foretold a number of things from November 2016…that were waiting for Donald Trump if he was elected President of the United States. She mentions nuclear war as a means to revert back to Globalism. That Trump was a threat to Global Governance.

Bss De Rothschild @BssDeRothschildWho is ready for WW3? It begins with Iran & US & of course the US’s new girlfriend Russia.”

Bss De Rothschild @BssDeRothschild: “After a Trump/Putin/Iran/China/NK Nuclear war, the world will revert back to the Globalist ideal offering security via Europe.” (BattleForWorld: Certain forces are aware that the globalists want to “destroy everything” – to make as much war as possible with countries, igniting World War 3, and then after the globalists hope they will be the victor to start anew.)

Bss De Rothschild @BssDeRothschild: “ISIS will be forgotten and overridden by the dominance of the incoming American, Russian & Asian Nuclear War. Started with Trump & Putin.” (BattleForWorld: This is the main reason for the Anti-Russian sentiment or Russophobia plan that the globalists are using Trump to continue, to eventually create a war clash with Russia, and also a war clash with China to officially bring out into the open World War 3 – to destroy as much as possible everything.)

Interestingly enough, despite their objections to our current President, another Rothchild was actually arrested by Adolf Hilter:

(Printed January 17, 1955), When the Nazis took over Austria in the Anschluss of 1938, Baron de Rothschild, then head of the Austrian banking operations of the family, was held prisoner by the Nazi secret police.

He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.

After his release by the Nazis, he went to South America. Later he came to the United States and became an American citizen. Besides his commercial activities, the baron was known as an amateur archaeologist and as a sponsor of research projects in the physical sciences.

[SOURCE]

References:

http://battleforworld.com/2018/06/30/megadonor-calls-for-nuclear-war-and-so-does-baroness-de-rothschild/#rothschildnuclearwarglobalism

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-conversation-with-tom-steyer-the-liberal-billionaire-bankrolling-trumps-impeachment-666891/

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Lawsuit Exposes Opioid Firm Placed Profits Over People (Video)

by N. Morgan

  • The lawsuit says Purdue violated a 2007 settlement with the state, placing profits over people with a deceptive narrative that claimed its opioids were safer than they actually were.
  • In Tennessee, there were 1,631 overdose deaths in 2016, including 1,186 from opioids, according to the state Department of Health.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More…

Nashville, Tennessee: A recently unsealed lawsuit by Tennessee’s attorney general revealed that the maker of the world’s top-selling painkiller directed its sales force to target the highest prescribers, many with limited or no pain management background or training.

Citing the public’s right to know, Attorney General Herbert Slatery said Thursday that OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma has dropped its previous efforts to shield details of the 274-page lawsuit in state court. The Tennessee Coalition for Open Government and the Knoxville News Sentinel had also requested that the lawsuit’s records become public.

The lawsuit says Purdue violated a 2007 settlement with the state, placing profits over people with a deceptive narrative that claimed its opioids were safer than they actually were. The lawsuit also says the Stamford, Connecticut-based company targeted vulnerable people, including the elderly.

Purdue did so while relying on continued users and high doses, according to the lawsuit: 104.3 million OxyContin tablets were prescribed in Tennessee from 2008 to 2017, with 53.7 percent of them 40 milligrams or higher. And more than 80 percent of Purdue’s business consistently came from continued users, the lawsuit says.

For example, Purdue called on two providers 48 times after law enforcement told Purdue the pair was responsible for significant interstate OxyContin diversion, the lawsuit says. The company called on another provider 31 times after the provider’s license was placed on restrictive probation related to high-prescribing of controlled substances, the lawsuit adds.

The state’s lawsuit says Purdue kept pushing to sell its products despite a litany of red flags.

“Purdue continued to make sales calls in spite of credible reports of patient overdoses, indictments, adverse licensure actions, a provider admitting he was addicted to heroin, a knife fight outside a provider’s office, muggings over controlled substances outside of a pharmacy linked to a specific provider, a clinic that had no examination tables or equipment, an admission by a provider that he was running a pill mill, a provider changing the name of his practice shortly after he was notified of a state investigation into his practice, a patient being coached in the waiting room about how to fill out intake forms, armed guards in provider waiting rooms, high numbers of patients who purchased OxyContin in cash, high numbers of out-of-state or out-of-county tags in providers’ parking lots, accusations of insurance fraud, choreographed urine screenings and pill counts, standing-room-only waiting rooms, and additional signs of problematic high volume practices,” the lawsuit states.

Purdue has denied claims in lawsuits nationwide over the scourge of opioid abuse, saying it will defend itself. In Tennessee, there were 1,631 overdose deaths in 2016, including 1,186 from opioids, according to the state Department of Health.

Tennessee filed its complaint last month at the same time Florida, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nevada, and Texas brought similar lawsuits claiming unfair and deceptive trade practices.

[SOURCE]

References:

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1334141/business-economy

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM94yE2X1Vaf5c1Fg-JsEjA

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

 

Checkmate, Trump’s China Syndrome (Videos)

by N.Morgan

 

The complicated and complex relationship between China and the United States spans the pages of history.

China has notoriously taken advantage of the goodwill shown by the United States on the financial front and the trading scene.

President Trump has been very open in his opinion about how for years China has been unfair in its trade practices with the United States.

President Trump: “China has consistently taken advantage of the American economy with practices that undermine fair and reciprocal trade”.

Examples of unfair trading are:

  • China has pursued industrial policies and unfair trade practices—including dumping, discriminatory non-tariff barriers, forced technology transfer, overcapacity and industrial subsidies—that champion Chinese firms and make it impossible for many United States firms to compete on a level playing field.
  • China’s industrial policies, such as its “Made in China 2025” plan, harm companies in the United States and around the world.
  • China imposes much higher tariffs on United States exports than the United States imposes on China.
    • China’s average tariff rate is nearly three times higher than the average United States rate.
    • Certain products are even more imbalanced. For instance, the United States charges a 2.5 percent tariff on Chinese cars, while China currently maintains a 25 percent tariff on cars from the United States.
  • China has banned imports of United States agricultural products such as poultry, cutting off America’s ranchers and farmers from a major market for their goods.
  • China has dumped and unfairly subsidized a range of goods for the United States market, undermining America’s domestic industry.
    • In 2018 alone, the Trump Administration has found dumping or unfair subsidies on 13 different products, including steel wheels, cold-drawn mechanical tubing, tool chests and cabinets, forged steel fittings, aluminum foil, rubber bands, cast iron soil pipe and fittings, and large diameter welded pipe.
  • In January 2018, the Trump Administration found that China’s overproduction of steel and aluminum, and the resulting impact on global markets, is a circumstance that threatens to impair America’s national security.
  • The United States has run a trade in goods deficit with China for years, including a $375 billion deficit in 2017 alone.

China has aggressively sought to obtain technology from American companies and undermine American innovation and creativity. There have recently been reports that China actively sends Chinese “agents” to the United States, often disguised as students, to learn about and steal new technologies and intellectual resources.

  • The value of China’s intellectual property theft costs United States innovators billions of dollars a year, and China accounts for 87 percent of counterfeit goods seized coming into the United States.
  • United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) Section 301 investigation identified four of China’s aggressive technology policies which put 44 million American technology jobs at risk:
    • Forced technology transfer;
    • Requiring licensing at less than economic value;
    • Chinese state-directed acquisition of sensitive United States technology for strategic purposes; and
    • Outright cyber theft.
  • China uses foreign ownership restrictions, administrative review and licensing processes to force or pressure technology transfers from American companies.
    • China requires foreign companies that access their New Energy Vehicles market to transfer core technologies and disclose development and manufacturing technology.
    • China imposes contractual restrictions on the licensing of intellectual property and technology by foreign firms into China but does not put the same restrictions on contracts between two Chinese enterprises.
  • China directs and facilitates investments in and acquisitions of United States companies to generate large-scale technology transfer.
  • China conducts and supports cyber intrusions into United States computer networks to gain access to valuable business information so Chinese companies can copy products.

President Trump has begun taking long overdue action to finally address the source of the problem, the unfair trade practices of China which hurt America’s workers and our innovative industries.

The Chinese Revolution of 1949

On October 1, 1949, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong declared the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The announcement ended the costly full-scale civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Nationalist Party, or Kuomintang (KMT), which broke out immediately following World War II and had been preceded by on and off conflict between the two sides since the 1920’s. The creation of the PRC also completed the long process of governmental upheaval in China begun by the Chinese Revolution of 1911.

The “fall” of mainland China to communism in 1949 led the United States to suspend diplomatic ties with the PRC for decades.

The outbreak of the Korean War, which pitted the PRC and the United States on opposite sides of an international conflict, ended any opportunity for accommodation between the PRC and the United States. Truman’s desire to prevent the Korean conflict from spreading south led to the U.S. policy of protecting the Chiang Kai-shek government on Taiwan.

For close to thirty years after the Chinese revolution of 1949, there were few contacts, limited trade and no diplomatic ties between the two countries.

Until the late 1970s, the United States continued to recognize the Republic of China, located on Taiwan, as China’s true government and supported that government’s holding of the Chinese seat in the United Nations.

History of Chinese Foreign Trade

Beginning in the late 1970s, China reversed the Maoist economic development strategy and, by the early 1980s, had committed itself to a policy of being more open to the outside world and widening foreign economic relations and trade.

The opening up policy led to the reorganization and decentralization of foreign trade institutions, the adoption of a legal framework to facilitate foreign economic relations and trade, direct foreign investment, the creation of special economic zones, the rapid expansion of foreign trade, the importation of foreign technology and management methods, involvement in international financial markets and participation in international foreign economic organizations.

These changes not only benefited the Chinese economy but also integrated China into the world economy.

In 1985, the United States had just begun a growing trade deficit with China. During the 1990s, the United States trade deficit became a more excessive long-running trade deficit, mostly with Asia. By 2012, the U.S. trade deficit, fiscal budget deficit, and federal debt had increased to record or near-record levels following the implementation of broad unconditional or unilateral United States free trade policies and formal trade agreements during the preceding decades.

China has seen substantial economic growth over a 50 year period, and at a nuclear-security summit which took place in early 2010, President Obama hoped to ensure another 50 years of growth between the two countries. On April 19, 2010, President Obama met with China’s President Hu Jintao to discuss trade policies between the two countries.

The U.S.–China Relations Act of 2000 was an act which granted permanent normal trade relations to China; it was signed on October 10, 2000, by President Bill Clinton.

Prior to passage of the bill, China was subject to an annual review of its trade status with the United States. The act removed the review, eased some trade barriers and facilitated China’s entry into the World Trade Organization.

Despite growing commercial ties, the bilateral economic relationship (between China and the United States) has become increasingly complex and often fraught with tension. From the United States’ perspective, many trade tensions stem from China’s incomplete transition to a free market economy.

While China has significantly liberalized its economic and trade regimes over the past three decades, it continues to maintain (or has recently imposed) a number of state-directed policies that appear to distort trade and investment flows.

Major areas of concern expressed by United States policymakers and stakeholders include China’s alleged widespread cyber economic espionage against US firms; relatively ineffective record of enforcing intellectual property rights (IPR); discriminatory innovation policies; mixed record on implementing its World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations; extensive use of industrial policies (such as subsidies and trade and investment barriers) to promote and protect industries favored by the (Chinese) government; and interventionist policies to influence the value of its (China’s) currency.

Many United States policymakers argue that such policies adversely impact our economic interests, and have contributed to United States’ job losses in some sectors.

United States-China trade rose rapidly after the two nations reestablished diplomatic relations in January 1979, signed a bilateral trade agreement in July 1979 and provided mutual most-favored-nation (MFN) treatment, beginning in 1980.

In that year (which was shortly after China’s economic reforms began), total United States-China trade (exports plus imports) was approximately $4 billion.

China ranked as the United States’ 24th largest trading partner, 16th largest export market and 36th largest source of imports. In 2017, total U.S. merchandise trade with China was $636 billion, making China the United States’ largest trading partner.

Currently, President Trump is attempting to turn these failed trade policies around. The required chnages will not happen without some suffering, but once the pain is over, America will prosper again. The liberal left has been pushing their New World Order for some time now, and President Trump’s new China policy could turn the tables on the globalists.

[SOURCE]

References

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/chinese-rev

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_trade_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_trade_of_the_United_States

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33536.pdf

http://beforeitsnews.com/military/2018/06/chinese-national-arrested-for-conspiring-to-illegally-export-u-s-origin-goods-used-in-anti-submarine-warfare-to-china-2481675.html

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan