Peter Strzok’s Girlfriend Blows the Whistle (Video)

Politics

by N. Morgan

 

The Republicans had hoped to have the testimony of Lisa Page already in hand when they started questioning Peter Strzok, but on Wednesday, 11 July 2018, Lisa Page foiled that strategy by refusing to comply with a subpoena and be questioned by the committee in private.

Instead, she presented herself two days later, let the testimony of Peter Strzok set the tone before sharing her version of things.

Speaking with select House committee members, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page was “cooperative” and “credible” during a closed-door session which lasted nearly five hours on Friday, 13 July 2018.

U.S. Rep. Mark Meadows, Republican from North Carolina, had been among Page’s harshest critics heading into the session, but he said her cooperation during the session, “speaks well of her,” according to the Hill.

“She’s been willing to help in the spirit of transparency. … We’ve certainly learned additional things today,”Meadows said.

In the private testimony, she primarily answered questions about the text messages with Peter Strzok which allegedly showed bias against then-candidate Donald Trump, the New York Post reported.

Meadows called Page a “credible witness,” as he walked out of the hearing, the report said.

U.S. Rep. John Ratcliffe, Republican from Texas, was more concerned with corroborating Lisa Page’s account with that of Strzok.

A Democratic congressional source told the Hill that two hours into the interview, Lisa Page did not appear to have contradicted Strzok’s testimony in any way.

“Lisa Page is not an FBI employee, but the FBI was here providing counsel and giving her direction as to which questions to answer or not answer and there is a question as to the propriety of that before the House,”

According to the Hill, Matt Gaetz, Republican from Florida, questioned the presence of the FBI providing legal support. “Lisa Page is not an FBI employee, but the FBI was here providing counsel and giving her direction as to which questions to answer or not answer, and there is a question as to the propriety of that before the House.”

Matt Gaetz also said he found the testimony of Lisa Page to be “more credible” than Strzok, the New York Post reported.

Lisa Page turned on Peter Strzok and is Telling Them EVERYTHING!

The investigation into the emails of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and the implications of their actions are just the latest in a string of events, missteps, and cover-ups which have taken place in the federal justice system, all kept hidden from American citizens for so long.

Disclosures in recent years have revealed public officials at the highest levels – White House, U.S. Senate, judiciary – guilty of dishonest and illegal behavior resulting even in death.

During this same period of time, the law itself became a weapon to be used by Government against American citizens. This has resulted in the prosecution, conviction, and imprisonment of individuals for actions which were not even criminal, and the ultimate destruction of all faith by the public in the current justice system.

It will take time for the American public to begin to believe again in the federal justice system because of the rampant corruption which has now been revealed. The slow judiciary actions to remove and prosecute those revealed to be at fault will only delay this return of faith.

[SOURCE]

References:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/14/lisa-page-cooperative-credible-lawmakers-say-after-5-hour-closed-door-session.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJPM5HBBy70&feature=youtu.be

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Advertisements

Billionaire Calling For ‘Nuclear War’ To Stop President Trump and So Are the Rothschilds (Videos)

Power Elite, Rothschild

by N. Morgan

 

The hysteria over the current president is driving his opposition to call for the ultimate end, nuclear war.

Left-wing billionaire Tom Steyer said perhaps there could be a “nuclear war” that would provide a “real course correction” to Donald Trump’s presidency during a recent interview published by Rolling Stone.

He said: 

“I remember 2006,” Steyer said. “What happened is that George W. Bush, he put us in two disastrous wars and we were headed toward the biggest financial disaster since the Great Depression. So if the answer is that we need those three things to happen for a course correction, I’d prefer to move a little quicker. How about that? But I take your point. Maybe we can have, like, a nuclear war and then we get a real course correction.

The shocked interviewer Tim Dickinson responded, that was a “sobering” thought, and Steyer replied he would take back the “nuclear war” comment.

Baroness de Rothschild Obsessed with the Breakout of Nuclear War

BATTLE FOR WORLDThe aristocrat prophetess Baroness De Rothschild foretold a number of things from November 2016…that were waiting for Donald Trump if he was elected President of the United States. She mentions nuclear war as a means to revert back to Globalism. That Trump was a threat to Global Governance.

Bss De Rothschild @BssDeRothschildWho is ready for WW3? It begins with Iran & US & of course the US’s new girlfriend Russia.”

Bss De Rothschild @BssDeRothschild: “After a Trump/Putin/Iran/China/NK Nuclear war, the world will revert back to the Globalist ideal offering security via Europe.” (BattleForWorld: Certain forces are aware that the globalists want to “destroy everything” – to make as much war as possible with countries, igniting World War 3, and then after the globalists hope they will be the victor to start anew.)

Bss De Rothschild @BssDeRothschild: “ISIS will be forgotten and overridden by the dominance of the incoming American, Russian & Asian Nuclear War. Started with Trump & Putin.” (BattleForWorld: This is the main reason for the Anti-Russian sentiment or Russophobia plan that the globalists are using Trump to continue, to eventually create a war clash with Russia, and also a war clash with China to officially bring out into the open World War 3 – to destroy as much as possible everything.)

Interestingly enough, despite their objections to our current President, another Rothchild was actually arrested by Adolf Hilter:

(Printed January 17, 1955), When the Nazis took over Austria in the Anschluss of 1938, Baron de Rothschild, then head of the Austrian banking operations of the family, was held prisoner by the Nazi secret police.

He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.

After his release by the Nazis, he went to South America. Later he came to the United States and became an American citizen. Besides his commercial activities, the baron was known as an amateur archaeologist and as a sponsor of research projects in the physical sciences.

[SOURCE]

References:

http://battleforworld.com/2018/06/30/megadonor-calls-for-nuclear-war-and-so-does-baroness-de-rothschild/#rothschildnuclearwarglobalism

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-conversation-with-tom-steyer-the-liberal-billionaire-bankrolling-trumps-impeachment-666891/

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Lawsuit Exposes Opioid Firm Placed Profits Over People (Video)

Health, Uncategorized

by N. Morgan

  • The lawsuit says Purdue violated a 2007 settlement with the state, placing profits over people with a deceptive narrative that claimed its opioids were safer than they actually were.
  • In Tennessee, there were 1,631 overdose deaths in 2016, including 1,186 from opioids, according to the state Department of Health.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More…

Nashville, Tennessee: A recently unsealed lawsuit by Tennessee’s attorney general revealed that the maker of the world’s top-selling painkiller directed its sales force to target the highest prescribers, many with limited or no pain management background or training.

Citing the public’s right to know, Attorney General Herbert Slatery said Thursday that OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma has dropped its previous efforts to shield details of the 274-page lawsuit in state court. The Tennessee Coalition for Open Government and the Knoxville News Sentinel had also requested that the lawsuit’s records become public.

The lawsuit says Purdue violated a 2007 settlement with the state, placing profits over people with a deceptive narrative that claimed its opioids were safer than they actually were. The lawsuit also says the Stamford, Connecticut-based company targeted vulnerable people, including the elderly.

Purdue did so while relying on continued users and high doses, according to the lawsuit: 104.3 million OxyContin tablets were prescribed in Tennessee from 2008 to 2017, with 53.7 percent of them 40 milligrams or higher. And more than 80 percent of Purdue’s business consistently came from continued users, the lawsuit says.

For example, Purdue called on two providers 48 times after law enforcement told Purdue the pair was responsible for significant interstate OxyContin diversion, the lawsuit says. The company called on another provider 31 times after the provider’s license was placed on restrictive probation related to high-prescribing of controlled substances, the lawsuit adds.

The state’s lawsuit says Purdue kept pushing to sell its products despite a litany of red flags.

“Purdue continued to make sales calls in spite of credible reports of patient overdoses, indictments, adverse licensure actions, a provider admitting he was addicted to heroin, a knife fight outside a provider’s office, muggings over controlled substances outside of a pharmacy linked to a specific provider, a clinic that had no examination tables or equipment, an admission by a provider that he was running a pill mill, a provider changing the name of his practice shortly after he was notified of a state investigation into his practice, a patient being coached in the waiting room about how to fill out intake forms, armed guards in provider waiting rooms, high numbers of patients who purchased OxyContin in cash, high numbers of out-of-state or out-of-county tags in providers’ parking lots, accusations of insurance fraud, choreographed urine screenings and pill counts, standing-room-only waiting rooms, and additional signs of problematic high volume practices,” the lawsuit states.

Purdue has denied claims in lawsuits nationwide over the scourge of opioid abuse, saying it will defend itself. In Tennessee, there were 1,631 overdose deaths in 2016, including 1,186 from opioids, according to the state Department of Health.

Tennessee filed its complaint last month at the same time Florida, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nevada, and Texas brought similar lawsuits claiming unfair and deceptive trade practices.

[SOURCE]

References:

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1334141/business-economy

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM94yE2X1Vaf5c1Fg-JsEjA

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

 

Checkmate, Trump’s China Syndrome (Videos)

Economy, Politics

by N.Morgan

 

The complicated and complex relationship between China and the United States spans the pages of history.

China has notoriously taken advantage of the goodwill shown by the United States on the financial front and the trading scene.

President Trump has been very open in his opinion about how for years China has been unfair in its trade practices with the United States.

President Trump: “China has consistently taken advantage of the American economy with practices that undermine fair and reciprocal trade”.

Examples of unfair trading are:

  • China has pursued industrial policies and unfair trade practices—including dumping, discriminatory non-tariff barriers, forced technology transfer, overcapacity and industrial subsidies—that champion Chinese firms and make it impossible for many United States firms to compete on a level playing field.
  • China’s industrial policies, such as its “Made in China 2025” plan, harm companies in the United States and around the world.
  • China imposes much higher tariffs on United States exports than the United States imposes on China.
    • China’s average tariff rate is nearly three times higher than the average United States rate.
    • Certain products are even more imbalanced. For instance, the United States charges a 2.5 percent tariff on Chinese cars, while China currently maintains a 25 percent tariff on cars from the United States.
  • China has banned imports of United States agricultural products such as poultry, cutting off America’s ranchers and farmers from a major market for their goods.
  • China has dumped and unfairly subsidized a range of goods for the United States market, undermining America’s domestic industry.
    • In 2018 alone, the Trump Administration has found dumping or unfair subsidies on 13 different products, including steel wheels, cold-drawn mechanical tubing, tool chests and cabinets, forged steel fittings, aluminum foil, rubber bands, cast iron soil pipe and fittings, and large diameter welded pipe.
  • In January 2018, the Trump Administration found that China’s overproduction of steel and aluminum, and the resulting impact on global markets, is a circumstance that threatens to impair America’s national security.
  • The United States has run a trade in goods deficit with China for years, including a $375 billion deficit in 2017 alone.

China has aggressively sought to obtain technology from American companies and undermine American innovation and creativity. There have recently been reports that China actively sends Chinese “agents” to the United States, often disguised as students, to learn about and steal new technologies and intellectual resources.

  • The value of China’s intellectual property theft costs United States innovators billions of dollars a year, and China accounts for 87 percent of counterfeit goods seized coming into the United States.
  • United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) Section 301 investigation identified four of China’s aggressive technology policies which put 44 million American technology jobs at risk:
    • Forced technology transfer;
    • Requiring licensing at less than economic value;
    • Chinese state-directed acquisition of sensitive United States technology for strategic purposes; and
    • Outright cyber theft.
  • China uses foreign ownership restrictions, administrative review and licensing processes to force or pressure technology transfers from American companies.
    • China requires foreign companies that access their New Energy Vehicles market to transfer core technologies and disclose development and manufacturing technology.
    • China imposes contractual restrictions on the licensing of intellectual property and technology by foreign firms into China but does not put the same restrictions on contracts between two Chinese enterprises.
  • China directs and facilitates investments in and acquisitions of United States companies to generate large-scale technology transfer.
  • China conducts and supports cyber intrusions into United States computer networks to gain access to valuable business information so Chinese companies can copy products.

President Trump has begun taking long overdue action to finally address the source of the problem, the unfair trade practices of China which hurt America’s workers and our innovative industries.

The Chinese Revolution of 1949

On October 1, 1949, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong declared the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The announcement ended the costly full-scale civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Nationalist Party, or Kuomintang (KMT), which broke out immediately following World War II and had been preceded by on and off conflict between the two sides since the 1920’s. The creation of the PRC also completed the long process of governmental upheaval in China begun by the Chinese Revolution of 1911.

The “fall” of mainland China to communism in 1949 led the United States to suspend diplomatic ties with the PRC for decades.

The outbreak of the Korean War, which pitted the PRC and the United States on opposite sides of an international conflict, ended any opportunity for accommodation between the PRC and the United States. Truman’s desire to prevent the Korean conflict from spreading south led to the U.S. policy of protecting the Chiang Kai-shek government on Taiwan.

For close to thirty years after the Chinese revolution of 1949, there were few contacts, limited trade and no diplomatic ties between the two countries.

Until the late 1970s, the United States continued to recognize the Republic of China, located on Taiwan, as China’s true government and supported that government’s holding of the Chinese seat in the United Nations.

History of Chinese Foreign Trade

Beginning in the late 1970s, China reversed the Maoist economic development strategy and, by the early 1980s, had committed itself to a policy of being more open to the outside world and widening foreign economic relations and trade.

The opening up policy led to the reorganization and decentralization of foreign trade institutions, the adoption of a legal framework to facilitate foreign economic relations and trade, direct foreign investment, the creation of special economic zones, the rapid expansion of foreign trade, the importation of foreign technology and management methods, involvement in international financial markets and participation in international foreign economic organizations.

These changes not only benefited the Chinese economy but also integrated China into the world economy.

In 1985, the United States had just begun a growing trade deficit with China. During the 1990s, the United States trade deficit became a more excessive long-running trade deficit, mostly with Asia. By 2012, the U.S. trade deficit, fiscal budget deficit, and federal debt had increased to record or near-record levels following the implementation of broad unconditional or unilateral United States free trade policies and formal trade agreements during the preceding decades.

China has seen substantial economic growth over a 50 year period, and at a nuclear-security summit which took place in early 2010, President Obama hoped to ensure another 50 years of growth between the two countries. On April 19, 2010, President Obama met with China’s President Hu Jintao to discuss trade policies between the two countries.

The U.S.–China Relations Act of 2000 was an act which granted permanent normal trade relations to China; it was signed on October 10, 2000, by President Bill Clinton.

Prior to passage of the bill, China was subject to an annual review of its trade status with the United States. The act removed the review, eased some trade barriers and facilitated China’s entry into the World Trade Organization.

Despite growing commercial ties, the bilateral economic relationship (between China and the United States) has become increasingly complex and often fraught with tension. From the United States’ perspective, many trade tensions stem from China’s incomplete transition to a free market economy.

While China has significantly liberalized its economic and trade regimes over the past three decades, it continues to maintain (or has recently imposed) a number of state-directed policies that appear to distort trade and investment flows.

Major areas of concern expressed by United States policymakers and stakeholders include China’s alleged widespread cyber economic espionage against US firms; relatively ineffective record of enforcing intellectual property rights (IPR); discriminatory innovation policies; mixed record on implementing its World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations; extensive use of industrial policies (such as subsidies and trade and investment barriers) to promote and protect industries favored by the (Chinese) government; and interventionist policies to influence the value of its (China’s) currency.

Many United States policymakers argue that such policies adversely impact our economic interests, and have contributed to United States’ job losses in some sectors.

United States-China trade rose rapidly after the two nations reestablished diplomatic relations in January 1979, signed a bilateral trade agreement in July 1979 and provided mutual most-favored-nation (MFN) treatment, beginning in 1980.

In that year (which was shortly after China’s economic reforms began), total United States-China trade (exports plus imports) was approximately $4 billion.

China ranked as the United States’ 24th largest trading partner, 16th largest export market and 36th largest source of imports. In 2017, total U.S. merchandise trade with China was $636 billion, making China the United States’ largest trading partner.

Currently, President Trump is attempting to turn these failed trade policies around. The required chnages will not happen without some suffering, but once the pain is over, America will prosper again. The liberal left has been pushing their New World Order for some time now, and President Trump’s new China policy could turn the tables on the globalists.

[SOURCE]

References

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/chinese-rev

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_trade_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_trade_of_the_United_States

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33536.pdf

http://beforeitsnews.com/military/2018/06/chinese-national-arrested-for-conspiring-to-illegally-export-u-s-origin-goods-used-in-anti-submarine-warfare-to-china-2481675.html

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Must Watch: Pedogate Disinfo Op and Cover-up Blown Wide Open (Video)

Power Elite

by N.Morgan

 

There is an operation going down to save the children in Arizona from the Elitists sex trafficking ring, which is being led by the OathKeepers.

In the video below, Stewart Rhodes, leader of the Oathkeepers, exposes the Elites latest ploy to distract from their monstrous crimes by blaming the very ones there to stop them.

The video by SGTreport exposes the bait and switch taking place in Arizona and what has been discovered in this latest mission.

It’s pretty clear what’s going on here, and the enemies of truth are showing their true colors. Instead of focusing on the message – that child sex trafficking is a very REAL and widespread problem in the United States and around the world – the focus is being placed on the messengers with every effort being expended to discredit the very people who are on the front lines in the fight for children.

[SOURCE]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlMsTm1TkzM

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Veterans on Patrol – Multiple Militia Mobilizing to Take Out Elite’s Pedophile Child Trafficking Ring Operation Backyard Brawl Oath Keepers III% (Videos)

Oath Keepers, Power Elite, Veterans

by N.Morgan 

 

Reader discretion advised: Not only the topic but also the urgency in the speaker’s voice can be unsettling, nervous-making. Gentler Readers may want to skip this.

Note that the producer of Hollywood pedophilia expose documentary “An Open Secret” has been expressing on Twitter his view that the situation in Tucson is being mishandled.

He believes the finding of what appears to be a presently unoccupied child trafficking site ought to be kept quiet and law enforcement notified, so the site could be watched with the expectation that folks using it would at some point return and could be captured.

Instead, he’s thinking, that opportunity is being lost and possibly even evidence is being destroyed by what the folks publicly calling for help with the situation are doing.

“That the folks “on the ground” in Tucson are more focused on the possibility there are children still in danger in the “trafficking corridor” they believe they’ve identified.

UPDATE: Veterans On Patrol Occupation Wants Constitutional Sheriff Tucson, AZ Call to all Patriots

RadicalWatch – Call For Armed Standoff – VOP Veterans On Patrol Demand Armed Occupation Over Arrests

[SOURCE]

References:

https://youtu.be/HrlPYKM19ek

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOpqg4JSCXM

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=100518

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Here’s What It Means If You See a Heart on a Child’s Wrist (Video)

Health

by N.Morgan

 

You may have seen those posts on social media showing photos of young children with little hearts drawn on their wrists.

In case you were curious to find out the meaning of those doodles, the video below is just for you.

Be prepared to see something really sweet and touching, while sending an important message on how to protect and support your child.

Liz Petrone spoke about her son Luca’s struggles with severe anxiety. One day the worried boy burst into tears when he got on the school bus.

Although Liz attempted to comfort him from the fear as much as she could, it didn’t help.

So the next morning she decided to give her son a “gift” to make him feel better.

She gave him a peck on the hand and drew a heart on the place she’d kissed.

The boy would look down at the heart and know that he’s loved and that everything’s gonna be okay.

If your child suffers from anxiety, there are a few things you can do to provide emotional support for them.

First of all, reassuring your little one that everything’s alright isn’t always the best idea.

When you’re anxious, you desperately want to believe that there’s nothing to worry about, but your brain won’t let you.

Reassure your children that you understand how scary it is and that you’ll be by their side until it’s they are feeling secure and unafraid again.

Create a “worry character” together with your child and give it a name.

While you’re doing this, have your son or daughter describe the character in detail, for instance, when it appears the most, how it behaves, how it feels, or when it goes away.

This will help you find out more about how your child’s really feeling and how they are coping with their anxiety.

[SOURCE]

Reference:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4rlAVgAK0SGk-yTfe48Qpw?sub_confirmation=1

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

One of the Greatest Cover-ups in History, it’s Time the World Knew: Cancer and the Rothschilds

Health, Rothschild

by N.Morgan

 

As many have suspected over the years, the Rothschilds control every market, including our medicine and foods.

Due to this, the Rothschilds have effectively removed from our diet the very foods that prevents cancer, by replacing good, healthy foods with their manufactured Frankenfoods.

Society needs to go back to organic and wholesome foods for better health and longevity.

If the Elite does not allow us to do so, then we must form a revolution.

What the rich are doing is a crime against Humanity and Life.

When will humanity revolt against the Elite?

The video below presents the stunning evidence of just how the Rothschilds have used Cancer to control our health.

[SOURCE]

Reference:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f7qhMjG6_s

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

“Wet-Ware” Soft Kill Plan Is Happening, but Can Be Stopped: Defund Them Now! (Videos)

Population Control, Power Elite

by N.Morgan

 

An intricate funding source for the Deep State is now being exposed, a British Crown-controlled company named Serco Inc. was awarded a $610 million contract to manage FEMA Region 9 that covers Arizona, California, Nevada, Hawaii and the Pacific Islands.

On Jul. 16, 2013, Obama awarded Serco a $1.2 billion contract to run the Obamacare website.

Serco also manages the air traffic control towers in 63 U.S. airports and has been paid more than $95 million to run the U.S. Patent and Trademark examination processes.

Who Is SERCO?

Why have we not heard of them? More to the point, why are we outsourcing critical American infrastructure, ingenuity and private medical information on every U.S. citizen to sworn agents of the British Crown?!

Serco’s most recent 2016 annual report published at Companies House in London provides critical clues about Serco’s unstated mission. In looking at Serco’s bizarre collection of subsidiaries, one is left with the evident conclusion that something nefarious is afoot.

Serco builds nuclear weapons, provides housing for migrants, reviews U.S. patents, runs the Obamacare website, operates obvious money-laundering shell companies in the Middle East, is teamed with Lockheed Martin, builds ships, manages massive IT infrastructure, manufactures space vehicles, runs job placement agencies, provides air traffic control to cities, runs rail services, manages parking meters, oversees FEMA Region 9, manages courts and prisons, and runs sports and recreation centers. Huh?

This is the weirdest list of companies one can imagine until one overlays Richard C. Walker’s “wet-ware” patents on top, then it makes sense.

 This Serco list of 73 subsidiaries revealed a shocking correlation among; (1) Serco’s business interests, (2) the activities of the Senior Executive Service (SES), and (3) the monstrous “Internet of Things” patents filed by Richard C. Walker, Hewlett-Packard and Agilent Technologies.

SES and Serco plan to control the world

In the next video, Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben discuss how Serco companies work with the SES Deep State shadow government to implement 5G, and then manage the societal effects of their coming mass murder program.

SHOCKING Global Control System Exposed

That’s why Serco runs FEMA camps, owns pathology companies, houses migrants, owns laundries, operates prisons, provides transport and rail, run hospitals and leisure centers, builds ships and space technology—to zap the populace with 5G like a mosquito zapper, then handle the cleanup.

Serco Group Plc Appendix A List of Subsidiaries from their Annual Report for 2016. Companies House. Serco Group Plc SUBSIDIARIES. (Dec. 31, 2016). Annual Report and Accounts 2016, Reg. No. 02048608. Serco. Companies House. (Raw *.xlsx file).

Serco Group Plc’s revenue sources from their 2016 Annual Report. Companies House. Serco Group PLC. (Dec. 31, 2016). Annual Report and Accounts 2016, Reg. No. 02048608. Serco. (Raw *.xlsx file).

Correlations in activities among Serco, OPIC, MCC, USAID, Crown Agents, American Inns of Court, Five Eyes, Highlands Group, IBM Eclipse Foundation, theft of Leader Technologies’ social networking invention, The Internet of Things, and Richard C. Walker’s “wet-ware” patents.

U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, re. Fig. 40 (“World Organization”). Incorporated by reference in multiple Walker applications, including U.S. Pat. App. No. 10/401,041, Fig. 2B, Automated Accounting System That Values Controls Records and Bills The Uses of Equipment Vehicles For Society. See also Meet The Person Who Can Remotely Crash Planes And Can Your Mind.

 

U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, Fig. 21. See Blanket Surveillance.

Call To Action:

The citizens of the United States and the world must call upon President Trump and loyal American leaders to defund the feeder systems used by these SES corruptocrats.

Ask President Trump to write the check to Leader Technologies for their Miller Act Notice so they can help implement new technologies that respect Constitutional privacy and property and help implement a truly Free Press.

[SOURCE]

References:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv0dEcvXLOf4ZFvjCahK4Lw

https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2018/05/ses-serco-wet-ware-soft-kill-plan-is_16.html

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan

Cops Can Find the Location of Any Phone in the Country in Seconds, and This Senator Wants to Know Why (Video)

Police State

by N.Morgan 

 

Last Thursday the New York Times published a blockbuster piece revealing how US law enforcement has access to a system that can geo-locate nearly any phone in the country without an officer necessarily having a court order.

The website Motherboard has published the letters that Senator Ron Wyden sent to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and telecommunications companies demanding answers on the controversial surveillance system.

I am writing to insist that AT&T take proactive steps to prevent the unrestricted disclosure and potential abuse of private customer data, including real-time location information, by at least one other company to the government,” a May 8 letter sent from Wyden to the President and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T reads.

As reported by the New York Times, a former sheriff of Mississippi County, Mo., used an obscure service called Securus to surveil targets’ cell phones, including a judge and other law enforcement officials.

That system is typically used by marketers to obtain location data from mobile carriers.

As well as AT&T, the system can exploit data from Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon, and law enforcement can essentially self-certify that they have legal authorization to use the service, the report suggests.

In his letter to AT&T, which has similar text to letters sent to other carriers, Wyden writes that this check amounts of “nothing more than the legal equivalent of a pinky promise.”

“The fact that Securus provides this service at all suggests that AT&T does not sufficiently control access to your customers’ private information,” the letter adds.

Wyden then lays out several steps for carriers to follow, such as undertaking an audit of each third party they sell customer data to, to determine how the company uses that data; notify customers whose location information was disclosed without their consent; terminate relationships with third parties that have misrepresented customer consent or abused their access to sensitive customer data; and provide a service for customers to view a list of third parties their data has been shared with.

“Americans should be able to obtain this information from wireless carriers, just as they can obtain from the consumer credit agencies a list of the private parties who have accessed their credit reports,” the letter reads.

Along with his letter to the FCC, Wyden asks the department to “promptly investigate Securus, the wireless carriers’ failure to maintain exclusive control over law enforcement access to their customers’ location data, and also conduct a broad investigation into what demonstration of customer consent, if any, each wireless carrier requires from other companies before the carries provide them with customer location information and other data.”

Tobias Engel, a security researcher and expert in mobile phone surveillance techniques, told Motherboard in an online chat “this is not about hacking at the core network level or mis-using technical services which were not designed to do this, but simply the US carriers selling out their subscribers.”

“LE [law enforcement] is piggybacking onto this ‘commercial’ option which seems to have a much lower entry barrier than if they requested this kind of access from the carriers themselves,” he added.

Nicholas Weaver, a senior researcher at the International Computer Science Institute at the University of California, Berkeley, told Motherboard in a Twitter message “This once again shows that data is like an oil spill: the contamination gets everywhere. The notion that a chain of 3+ companies, including one specifically intended for marketing, is able to resell access to everyone’s real-time location with pretty high precision is disturbing but it shouldn’t be surprising.”

“In the US, we don’t have legal protection against the misuse of our data outside limited categories. So for example, we do have good protection on social security and (depending on the state) DMV info. But our utilities or anybody else not explicitly regulated will sell, resell, re-bundle, repackage, and redistribute for practically any purpose they can,” he added.

Here are the letters: 

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4457319-Wyden-Securus-Location-Tracking-Letter-to-AT-amp-T.html#document/p1

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4457320-Wyden-Securus-Location-Tracking-Letter-to-FCC.html#document/p2

[SOURCE]

References:

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/evk484/securus-law-enforcement-track-phones-senator-wyden-letters​​​​​​​

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/10/technology/cellphone-tracking-law-enforcement.html

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4457319-Wyden-Securus-Location-Tracking-Letter-to-AT-amp-T.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMk8BFxa5S8​​​​​​​

More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan